*** pinned post ***
The best to ever do it: Estee Palti
#
October 7, 2024 Election Blogbit
Still need to register to vote ??? Register online @ vote.org or complete, print, and mail your voter registration application, but it must have todays post mark on it, because the deadline is today if you are planning to vote in the November 5 election.
October 1, 2024 Election Blogbit
A key function of the massive immigrant influx, is to insure a Blue Party victory in November. Simply, they likely can't win without the immigrant vote, and they know it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXceho61hAU
September 28, 2024 Election Blogbit
Here are some important dates and deadlines if you are registered to vote in Ohio:
Military & Overseas Absentee Voting: Begins September 20
Deadline to Register to Vote: October 7 (Boards open until 9:00 p.m.)
Early In-Person Voting: October 8 - November 3, and includes the two Saturdays and the two Sundays before Election Day.
Absentee Voting By Mail: Begins October 8
Election Day: November 5 (Polls Open 6:30 a.m. - 7:30 p.m.) If not returned by mail, absentee ballots must be received by your board of elections by 7:30 p.m.
#
September 26, 2024 Election Blogbit
This election is merely about making sure that the two party system prevails in America. I say that because the Red party has a legitimate basis upon which to challenge Kamala Harris ( ie. citizenship), yet they haven't done it.
Why?
Because if they challenge her and win , she would be off the ballot, which would open the door for a third party victory. And that could change the game forever. So, no, they're not going to raise formal questions about her citizenship, because, this election season is not about winning. Its about making sure things stay the same.
#
September 23, 2024 Election Blogbit
Kamala Harris: She Not Like Us
In an essay entitled "Reflections of a Jamaican Father," (2018), Donald J. Harris revealed that he was a descendant of Hamilton Brown, who founded Browns Town, Jamaica (formerly known as Hamilton Town). In addition, and per geni.com, Brown was born in 1776, and is described as "an Irish-born British sugar planter and slave owner," who served as a member of the House of Assembly of Jamaica for 22 years. The real skinny tho, is that , according to geni.com, Brown was blue party presidential candidate Kamala Harris's great - great- great grandfather !!! So THIS may be the information Miss Jackson was referring to IF she raised questions about the racial make up of either the presidential candidate or her parents.
Or was it the information on Kamala Harris's 1964 birth certificate (see below) that Miss Jackson was referring to, IF she raised questions about the racial make up of either the presidential candidate or her parents ???
Simply, per the birth certificate of the "They Not Like Us" presidential candidate, her mothers color or race is noted as 'Caucasian,' while her fathers color or race is noted as 'Jamaican.' For the record however, 'Jamaican,' is neither a color nor a race, nevertheless, that is the racial classification that is reflected for Donald Jasper Harris on Kamala Harris's birth certificate. And it is THIS information that Miss Jackson may have been referring to IF she raised questions about the racial make up of either the presidential candidate or her parents.
That said, the real question for Yours Truly, is not whether the "They Not Like Us" presidential candidate is black, or, for that matter, whether her parents, grand parents, great - grand parents , great - great - grandparents or great- great- great grand parents were black, white or polka dot. The question for Yours Truly is whether Kamala Harris is a U.S. citizen, because, clearly, pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act aka McCarran – Walter Act of 1952: she not like us.
#
September 22, 2024 Blogbit
If Kamala Harris had actually accomplished something during her years of service, the media would be talking about those acts -- not her race, gender or nationality.
#
September 21, 2024 Election Blogbit
Kamala Harris is Indian and Jamaican. Periodt. I would not normally bring it up, but since she is marketing herself as a "homegirl," and otherwise pandering for the black vote... lets keep it real.
#
September 20, 2024 Election Blogbit
I don't think the Republican Party is too eager to secure a win in this election, because if it were, it would be raising formal questions about Kamala Harris's citizenship or lack thereof, which, if properly raised, could potentially result in her being removed from the ballot. Consequently, this would clear the way for the Red party presidential candidate (ie. former President Trump), to enter a near uncontested race. But there has not been one peep from the Red party regarding Harris's citizenship or lack thereof, which is a topic that Eric J Brewer effectively address's in his well researched article @ejbnews.com
There should be a full and formal investigaton regarding her citizenship, and unless and until there is, I am not convinced she is a U.S. citizen.
And is it just me, or is Kamala Harris's father (Donald J. Harris), notably absent from the campaign trail? I mean, for real tho, bruh ain't been seen or heard from... well, not since Kamala's 2019 bid for the presidency anyway. At that time, he provided the following statement to Jamaica Global Online:
“Speaking for myself and my immediate Jamaican family, we wish to categorically dissociate ourselves from this travesty."
👀👀👀
Click the herein link to find out what 'travesty' he was referring to.
#
September 6, 2024 Election Blogbit
Ok, so RFK will potentially be on the ballot in 37 states (click this link), but will definitely not be on the ballot in 13. That said, I say we can still win this thing if everybody... literally everybody... in the 37 states in which he appears on the ballot, votes Kennedy. So lets make it happen. We can't afford to lose.
And please ignore the media spin about whats possible or not possible in this election , because it is precisely that: media spin.. no more , no less.
update: So, he's removing himself from the ballots in various states. That said, as of September 10, he's on 21 ballots, down from 37, which, obviously, doesn't bode well for those of us who are still #TeamKennedy.
#
September 4, 2024 Election Blogbit
#
September 3, 2024 Election Blogbit
Guess what? A suspended campaign doesn't mean what we thought it meant. That is, we THOUGHT it meant: the partys over.... but it does not. In fact, per pascovotes.com and similar sources, " if the political landscape changes dramatically, a suspended campaign could potentially spring back to life." The real news tho, is that, if ya'll vote for RFK in November, it counts as a vote, because he suspended his campaign, rather than terminated it. And there's a difference. Soooo, that being said, I'm back on the 'All the Way With RFK' bandwagon.
The question is: who wit me ? 👀
August 24, 2024 Election Blogbit
So, the campaign has been suspended, and, frankly, by mid - morning on Friday , I knew it probably would be , after realizing that (1) despite he had collected enough signatures to gain ballot access, he still was not on the ballot in most states, and, (2) the Democratic Party had filed several frivolous lawsuits in various states to prevent him from gaining ballot access, so an already uphill battle was becoming steeper and more difficult to overcome. And even if he successfully challenged the litigation on appeal, think of the cost, in terms of time and burden it would require. I'm not even sure it would have been humanly possible for him to address it all, or worth it for that matter, so , while Fridays news was a disappointment, it was not a surprise.
The take away tho ?
The take away remains what it was at the onset of the campaign: swift changes need to be made to the election process, because America can not continue to be dominated by the same two political parties that are currently running the game.
August 23, 2024 Election Blogbit
If there's one thing the media isn't telling you , it's that RFK is being sued in a number of states because of the Democratic Partys effort to keep him off the ballot. Click the below link to hear him discuss the frivolous lawsuits he's facing, and how he intends to challenge them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24kYp7506aQ
#
note: Speech today @ 2 pm EST ... streaming on X and most other social media.
August 22, 2024 Election Blogbit
Don't do it... Don't drop out 😵😵😵. Imma be pissed off if you do. See it thru.... at least wait until after Labor Day, otherwise, you bouta mess up my flow ( real talk).
August 21, 2024 Election Blogbit
So, there were a few ambiguous statements in Michelle Obama's DNC speech last night, and I suspect they were intentionally ambiguous. Again, there were only a few tho, because, had there been more, they would have been glaringly obvious, which would have made it easier to differentiate between what she was saying vs what she was REALLY saying. So she threw in a few ambiguous statements for good measure , and kept it moving.
Its called "double talk" in some circles... and I'll try to decode it all, by or before the end of the week.
Until then: don't fall for the okey doke ya'll... or should I say, the "alleged okey doke..." #Stay woke.
note: Michelle Obama's speech was not the only DNC speech that was laced with ambiguous statements. There were others, but for the record, and due to time restraints, I'm only going to decode her "double talk."
August 20, 2024 Election Blogbit
Don't drop out Cuz !!! You got this !!! Plus, America needs you !!! ( Real Talk) This election can not / will not be business as usual, but we need you to make the difference.
August 19, 2024 Election Blogbit
Shout out to the Plain Dealer, cleveland. com, and other media selling Kamala Harris on the basis of her skin color and gender. Sorry, but that Harris is a woman of color, is insufficient basis upon which to build a Presidential campaign, be it hers or any other. Simply, no one should build his or her campaign on the basis of gender or skin color. And thats on periodt.
August 17, 2024 Election Blogbit
So, is the Harris campaign buying space on the Drudge Report? I ask because, it seems odd that she is featured so prominently on Drudge these days... with non - stop pro Harris coverage. It seems very suspect to me.
posted now
As of today, RFK is on the ballot in all but four states ( ie. Wyoming, Arizona, Kentucky and Mississippi), consequently, he qualifies for the next debate, and must be included if one is held on September 10 as planned. If he is not included , or if the debate is cancelled, it will be for one reason and one reason only: "they" simply do not want him to be heard, because if he is heard, it will be clear that, contrary to the media spin that excludes him, he is the only man for the job.
note: I got this wrong, he completed the process that will allow for him to gain ballot access, but he is still trying to finalize the access ballot issue in many states.
August 1, 2024 Election Blogbit
While I did not watch the LIVE STREAM of the NABJ (National Association of Black Journalists) Q & A with former President Trump, I have since seen the replay. That said, if the Q & A took a turn for the worst (and it did) , the NABJ has only itself to blame. First, the Q & A, which was moderated by Rachel Scott (ABC News), Kadia Goba (Buzz Feed) , and Harris Faulkner (Fox News), got off to a late start by thirty minutes 😵, which was fully unacceptable, since "CP Time" simply has no place at this or any other large scale event. Second, lead moderator Rachel Scotts exchange with the former president was, at best: curt, terse , confrontational, and devoid of the objectivity one would expect from a seasoned journalist , or even an amateur. Consequently, the interview was difficult to watch, and took on a combative tone that was due almost entirely to Scott, whose anti - Trump stance was evident, and not a good look for a journalist, where, again, objectivity is key.
At the end of the day, Scott's "performance," was no surprise, but instead, mirrored that of her employer... a once respectable news organization that now, arguably, advances party agendas, and has become little more than the Democrat partys "bitch."
#
July 29, 2024 Election Blogbit
If it weren't for the fact that presidential hopeful Kamala Harris is being marketed to us as an African American woman who should get our vote for that reason, I would not even mention her race or ethnicity , but since she is being marketed to us as an African American woman who should get our vote for that reason, I feel compelled to remind some, and advise others, of the following:
Kamala Harris's mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was born and raised in India, which means Harris, is of Indian descent, and, by way of her father, Donald J Harris , she is also of Afro-Jamaican descent, since her father, a professor emeritus at Stanford University, was born and raised in Jamaica.
Gopolan and Harris met while both were students at the University of California, Berkeley. Theirs was a short lived marriage from 1963 - 1971, during which time Kamala, who spent her formative years in Canada, was born.
Fast forward to 2004, and Kamala's tenure in government begins with a controversial eight year stint as District Attorney of San Francisco, followed by a six year stint as Attorney General of California, five years as State Senator ( California) , and , since 2021, Vice President of the United States. But wait, theres more. As of July 22, 2024, she is the presumptive Democratic nominee for President of the United States, which is all fine and well, but for the fact that, again, she is being marketed to us as an African American woman who should get our vote for that reason. Moreover, and truth be told, not only is she being marketed to us as an African American woman who should get our vote for that reason, she is being marketed to us as Soul Sister #1, who should get our vote for that reason also.
But is she REALLY an African - American woman or Soul Sister # 1 ?
Even if your answer is " yes," the fact is, one's fitness to serve as President of the United States should not be determined or even influenced by ones race, gender or ability to git down, but instead, by ones accomplishments and /or game plan to move the country forward. The media and government then, should not be 'selling' Kamala based on race, gender and swag, with the idea that such a calculated marketing campaign will elevate her from VP to Prez. Should they think otherwise however, and continue to do so, both are in for a rude awakening.
July 27, 2024 Election Blogbit
My cousin's holding a Town Hall with Tik Tok influencers on Sunday (July 28). It starts at 7 pm EST. Here's the link if you'd like to attend
Likewise, on Tuesday (July 30) from 3 - 4 pm EST, he'll be holding a Q & A with baby boomers on Facebook. Here's the link for that event if you'd like to attend
And awww snap ... the online store ... 👀 ... But see, thats what I'm talkin bout tho
July 22, 2024 Election Blogbit
Our future president, RFK Jr., reacts to Bidens announcement and more, during Sundays press conference in Hyannis Port (note: you'll want to watch this one in its entirety, as well as his interview with Jesse Watters ) #47
July 21, 2024 Election Blog
I'm not really surprised to hear that President Biden has dropped out of the race. I saw it coming -- not because of the alleged pressure to drop out, but because I don't think he ever REALLY wanted to run for president... not now, not ever. I also think a lot of his recent fumblng , bumbling and brain fog has been an act , purposefully designed to justify dropping out of a race that he never wanted to enter. Likewise, I'd say the same for the sound byte uttered by George Stephanopolous -- in that his was a carefully uttered comment. I mean, since when does George Stephanopolus turn on his party? Since never... and certainly not on camera, unless of course its all staged to facilitate Bidens exit, and the Master Puppets entrance. Stay tuned...
July 15, 2024 Election Blogbit
Well, well, well. Secret Service protection finally granted huh? Thats great news. I'm just sorry it took an assassination attempt to get it done.
July 14, 2024 Election Blogbit
So , the always clever, talented and outspoken Amanda Seales , has outright proclaimed yesterdays "assassination attempt" on the former president to be a staged event. In other words, Seales says the whole thing was fake !!! Here's the now deleted video she posted to Instagram :
Hypothetically speaking tho, if yesterdays events were staged, what would be the motive or motives for staging such an event?
Well, let's see:
( 1) Ratings? Could it be that yesterdays "assassination attempt" (if staged) was designed to boost ratings for the upcoming RNC convention , which begins tomorrow, and runs thru the 18th?
or maybe
(2) Re-writing the narrative? Could it be that yesterdays " assassination attempt " (if staged) was designed to shift the talking point around "the Donald" from "convict" to "victim? "
Hmmm...perhaps either... or perhaps both (hypothetically speaking of course).
Who knows... but one things for sure... despite it all, "the Donald" stll managed to say hello to his (alleged) homies and allies, and for THAT they should be appreciativposted now
And one last thing, watch yo back for the fake comments, responses, bots, controlled media platforms , controlled social media platforms, black puppets, white puppets, and etc who will ( if they haven't already) denounce Seales on cue for speculating about the legitimacy of yesterdays events.
But exactly why is she being denounced? Well, she's being denounced because she, like other black celebrities, black public figures, high profile blacks and the like, may do only one of two things in modern day America: (1) Say what she is told to say, when she is told to say it or ( 2) Zip it
Anything beyond that is unacceptable.
And just to be clear, the current backlash that Seales is already facing from "a bought and paid for media and its servants," ( which now extends to social media platforms and comments therein ) is not in response to her theory, because , quite frankly, the same media and puppets who are denouncing Seales, have, in recent years, called Trump everything but a child of God. So where and how do they get off denouncing her when they have said worse? Naw... Seales theory ain't the issue. The issue is that Seales, as a high profile black woman ( or black woman in general for that matter), dared to say something the man didn't direct her to say. THAT'S the issue. Simply, if the man didn't give you the script, you aint supposed to say it, but ...Seales said something she hadnt been pre programmed to say, and THAT, is the issue.
Look on the bright side tho. At least she didn't claim that his real estate business is a front for the drug trade. At least she didn't claim that his money comes from drug trafficking , and real estate ventures that are intricately set up throughout the country to house such activity. At least she didnt claim that various government officials and entities were also involved, and/or propping it all up. In fact, she said nothing of the sort. All she said was : based on her years and experiences in da hood, the details of yesterdays events simply do not add up. Thats all she said.
She did not make any claim that aligned the former president to the drug trade , because, had Ms Seales made such a claim, even I would have to cancel her... unless of course, Ms Seales had the receipts to back it up.
July 3, 2024 Election Blogbit
Hearing all types of buzz about Joe Bidens possible withdrawal from the race, but unless or until it happens, I won't comment.
June 27, 2024 Election Blogbit
According to the media ... "most people are planning to watch the debate."
Really??? Not me. And where'd they get those stats from anyway ??? Oh that's right... they made 'em up 😂😂😂
(note: I don't mean to be rude, but I just didn't watch, sorry)
June 22, 2024 Election Blogbit
I don't think I'll be watching the debates... Its upsetting because, this two party focus , (despite that multiple candidates are running, and three qualified for the debate), is workin' my nerves. Lets face it, we have more than two options. Why doesn't the media reflect as much?
June 11, 2024 Election Blogbit
The stars are lining up in your favor Cuz (👀)
May 31, 2024 Election Blogbit
The so called 'hush money trial' actually concerns the falsification of business records, or rather, the alleged falsification of business records, but the media has done such a poor job of covering the story, and , moreover, made Stormy Daniels the face of it, that few understand what the case is really about. For that matter, the trial should have been televised-- afterall, defendant Donald J Trump is a former U.S. president and currently a 2024 Presidential candidate, thus the trial should have been deemed one of great public interest, and televised, but it was not. Consequently, at the end of the day, the coverage of the trial, or lack thereof, is Exhibit A of my argument that the media no longer serves us, but is, instead, a self serving entity, advancing its own hidden agenda.
May 6, 2024 Election Blogbit
If there's one takeaway from this election, its ballot access as a nearly insurmountable challenge. Simply, a candidate can make all the noise he or she wants, and be promising to boot, but if that same candidate can't get on the ballot ... issa wrap. Of course, I'm still hopeful, but, admittedly, I hate to have unrealistic expectations for the election.
April 28, 2024 Election Blogbit
I don't pretend to know what all of the "Trump" litigation is about, but the timing of it makes me very uncomfortable. That being said, it seems as if a stay pending the outcome of the election would have been in order for whatever cases are now before the Court, since its not every day that the defendant in a case is a former president, and presidential candidate. Frankly, those are game changing details, so, as such, I would be okay with a delay of the proceedings ... but doesn't seem that there's going to be one.
And why does he have to be in Court every day? I mean, since he has counsel, I thought his presence as a defendant would be optional, but then, like I said, I know very little about the pending litigation, why he is present every day, or what basis the Court gave for denying a stay -- provided a stay or delay was requested.
April 19, 2024 Election Blogbit
Don't give up Cuz. God has something in store for you. The country needs you, and He is about to flip the script in your favor. Don't give up before you get your blessing Cuz. This will not be an ordinary election.
Let's make it happen !!! #Kennedy24
April 15, 2024 Election Blogbit
Hang in there Rfk'ers, and don't pay any attention to the media spin about who's winning the election, because the media doesn't know. According to the media tho, this is a two candidate race, but I beg to differ. The media is pushin the same tired "two party" agenda that it always does. Yadda Yadda Yadda. It's all propaganda -- no more no less. Don't go for it, because we can do this !!! #Kennedy24
Let's make it happen !!!
March 26, 2024 Election Blogbit
Kennedy - Shanahan !!! Off to the White House !!! Let's make it happen !!! But first, we need an official photo (just saying).
#
March 25, 2024 Blogbit
VP Announcement tomorrow ya'll. Turn up!!!
#
March 19, 2024 Election Blogbit
RFK Jr. on Flagrant is his best, most informative interview ever. Great questions... great answers. Its Real talk and fascinating. Please take a moment to watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ikcyVzWSyU
note: The interview is notable for questioning the offical narrative regarding the deaths of President John F. Kennedy and Senator Robert F. Kennedy.
#
March 14, 2024 Election Blogbit
So, obviously, this page is largely about the upcoming Presidential election, but it will occasionally address issues or legislation that may be of particular interest during this election season, such as the 'Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,' aka the'Tik - Tok ban drama,'that is now before the Senate. Surely, you've heard of this legislation, as it seeks to ban Tik Tok, unless and until China hands control of its popular app over to ( I assume) the U.S. In any case, I'm closely monitoring the events, but since the legislation has only passed in the House, and yet to pass in the Senate, I'll hold off on comments until the final outcome. Of course, I'll comment whether it passes or not, but just waiting to see how the Senate vote goes. Any comment I make will post here... in the Election Blog.
#
VP announcement coming on March 26. Dat's what I'm talkin 'bout tho!!!
#
#
So, the headline reads: "Trump posts $91 Million Bond and files notice of appeal in E. Jean Carroll case," to which I respond:
Wait... What?!
What E. Jean Carroll case? What defamation suit? What 86 Million Judgment? Frankly, this is the first I've heard about the case, and don't even know what Court its in or when it was filed, but thats probably because the media hasn't covered it effectly, and I don't have time to chase this or any other story. Simply, I expect the media to keep me informed. Period. And when one of the parties to such a case is a former President, I expect it to be a front and center headline in both traditional and online media, but, as far as I can see, it has not been a front and center story. Instead, the posting of the bond and filing of the notice of appeal is the most coverage the story has received to date...or so it seems. Whats wild tho, is that, apparently, E Jean Carroll received a $5 million Judgment last year, and the former president was a party in that case as well! Amazingly enough, however, I don't know much about either case, and altho I just did a quick search in an effort to gain insight, and to see what I could find in the way of media coverage... I didn't find much. In fact, what headlines I found were vague... too vague to ascertain wassup, so I guess I'll be out of the loop indefinitely , because at the moment, I'm busy... too busy to chase the story. Of course, if the media would cover these matters in a complete, timely and appropriate manner... I wouldn't have to... ( chase the story that is)
#
March 5, 2024 Election Blogbit
Do what you gotta do Cuz. Just git on the ballot !!!
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4509804-rfk-jr-robert-f-kennedy-jr-libertarian/
#
February 26, 2024 Election Blogbit
Whether social media giants like Youtube, Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), should be able to control public discourse, has become a hot topic that is now headed for review by the U.S. Supreme Court (see link below):
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/02/25/supreme-court-social-media-case-texas-florida/72687015007/
Contrary to the opinion expressed at the above link tho, I don't think the issue before the Supreme Court will "turn" on whether Facebook is "more like a newspaper than a telephone." The issue will "turn" on whether social media giants, such as Facebook, are violating their users constitutional right to freedom of speech and/or freedom of the press, when user generated content is censored. The issue will also "turn" on whether social media giants are bound to uphold the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Keep in mind that the Constitution says:'Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.' It doesn't say 'Social media giants shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press,' consequently, social media giants may censor content on their platforms without legal consequences, because they are publicly and privately held entities.
Or are they?Are social media giants (or big tech for that matter) REALLY publicly and privately held entities as they purport to be? Or are they, in fact, government operatives? I allege they are government operatives, but are set up in such a way as to blur that fact. And what makes me say that? Well, take Twitter for instance, and its deactivation of the Mt Zion Baptist Church Twitter account, which was among the first fatalities when the "cyberspace war on words" began. The account, which was established in 2008, had minimal activity until around 2016, when it began to mock the Athens County Court of Common Pleas civil case, 'Ohio vs Mt Zion,' and Ohio Attorney General (now Governor) Mike DeWine , who filed it. It was pure satire, as the account, by and thru its Twitter posts, had a field day ridiculing the State over its unlawful actions towards the church. The posts became more clever with each day, and were largely based on events that were playing out as a result of 'Ohio vs Mt Zion.' And then.... one day, the account was abruptly deactivated, and numeorus attempts to reactivate it or obtain an explanation for its deactivation failed.
So, what happened? Why was the Mt Zion Twitter account deactivated?
The Mt Zion Twitter account was deactivated because the truth about the government takeover at Mt Zion Baptist Church was never supposed to get out. Instead, the truth has been replaced with a fabricated narrative that is being advanced by the media.That said, if, social media giants such as Twitter, are, in fact, government operatives, and not the private or publicly held entities they purport to be... that would explain the deactivation of the Mt Zion Twitter account, because, only government, or a government operative, would be harmed by a Twitter account that exposed government misconduct. A private or publicly held entity would not be affected by such revelations, thus a private or publicly held entity would not deactivate an account that exposed government misconduct, because it would have no need to do so. But again, if social media giants are, in fact, government operatives that are in place to advance and protect the governments interests and agenda, that would explain, not just the deactivation of the Mt Zion account, but the tendency of social media giants to suppress information that is either contrary to the governments agenda , or exposes government misconduct.
The bottom line tho, is: who or what are these social media giants that have consumed our lives and limited our free speech all at the same time? Are they publicly held entities? Privately held entities? Or government operatives? And do they have a duty to uphold the provisions set forth in the Constitution , such as freedom of speech or freedom of the press? These are questions that have to be asked and answered.
Clearly however, if social media giants are government operatives that exist to advance government agendas, then they are essentially an arm of the government. And if they are an arm of the government, then they have a duty to abide by the provisions set forth in the Constitution, and may not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of their users. On the other hand, if they are privately or publicly held entities, I suspect social media giants may allow or disallow user content as they see fit, and, unfortunately, there ain't nuthin we can do about it.
Again, it all boils down to who or what these social media giants actually are, because if in fact they are government operatives, rather than the private or publicly held entities they have purported to be, then they must be sanctioned and held accountable, not just for suppressing and manipulating user content, but for defrauding the public as well.
#
February 24 Election Blogbit
Nikki Haley will not be the Republican Party nominee for President, so why is she getting so much media attention -- and right out of the gate, no less. She's been getting media attention from day one, but why?
Because she's a distraction, thats why.
She's a convenient distraction that allows the media to ignore third party and other candidates who could potentially be real contenders for the White House, but for the fact that the media thoroughly ignores them, and, as a result, you don't even know they exist. I mean, for lambsakes, they could at least tell you who's running.
For instance, in addition to Joe Biden, Dean Phillips and Cenk Uygur are running as Democratic Party candidates for the President of the United States. And in addition to Donald Trump and Nikki Haley, Ryan Binkley is running as a Republican Party candidate for the President of the United States. And of course, my cousin is running as an Independent party candidate, as is Cornel West. And there are others who are running , but the media is largely covering status quo candidates such as Joe Biden and Donald Trump; and for good measure, Nikki Haley.
Unless something extraordinary happens tho, Nikki Haley will not be the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States, but neither will she drop out of the race. So, does she think she can win? I doubt it, but if she drops out, she will no longer be in the headlines, so I expect her to ride until the wheels fall off, because she's probably loving the publicity. And of course, if she drops out, the media will be forced to talk to some of the other candidates. Ya think? Or maybe at that point, the media would just make it a two party race. One never knows what the media will do, since most news outlets can't even maintain an up to date list of Presidential candidates (go figure). In any case, I'm not suggesting Haley drop out of the race, unless she wants to, but I think she has been a distraction from the onset, and a distraction she will remain until the end, or until her 15 minutes expire... whichever comes first.
#
February 20, 2024 Election Blogbit
Imagine if you will, a hypothetical situation where the Presidential candidates for the two major political parties cancel themselves outright, and, as a result, a clear path to the White House with no encumbrances is established for RFK Jr aka the ONLY man for the job.
#Kennedy24
Imagine that.
#
February 7, 2024 Election Blogbit
If there is one thing I truly want and expect from an election, its a fair fight. I don't want to see, or think I see, calculated efforts to trip up or distract a candidate so as to cause one to prevail over the other. Just let the best man ( or woman ) win... and in a manner that is fair and consistent with law. For instance, I see no reason to "remove Trump" from the ballot. And don't expect The Supreme Court to do it. You simply can't take someone off the ballot without just cause, and the effort to do so is just plain silly at this point. Now, does this mean that I'm suddenly stomping for Trump? No. My cousins the only man for the job. But fair is fair. So , lets everybody man up and proceed in a civilized manner. Ok?
#
February 4, 2024 Election Blogbit
#
January 30, 2024 Election Blogbit
RFK Jr. as the Libertarian Party's Presidential candidate? Sounds good to me...
Of course, nothings been finalized as yet, but if it will streamline the process of getting RFK on the ballot in all fifty states , and change the trajectory of the election process in so doing... I'm in. #Kennedy24 #LetsMakeitHappen
The need for a Kennedy24 campaign and presidency goes to a whole notha level once you understand why George Washington was opposed to the two party system, and, moreover, discover that Washington's term in office predates the formation of the Democratic and Republican political parties.
#
If there's one take away from this election year ( thus far anyway), it's that America is a two party system, or prefers to be. I mean, let's face it, even the media plays along, because, historically, media covers presidential contenders from the two major parties, and ignores everyone else. And this year is no different. That said, while its not impossible for an Independent or other third party candidate to win a presidential election in this or any other election year.... it ain't easy, because there are impediments to that process... and they are excessive. Still, never say never...especially if you are the best, or rather, the ONLY man for the job.
Happy Birthday to the future President of the United States.